RACE Programming vs other frameworks
Direct comparisons (roles, cadence, artifacts, feedback loops, and economics) between RACE Programming and the frameworks teams use today.
RACE Programming vs Scrum
Scrum is permissive and built for human-only teams; RACE Programming is prescriptive and built for AI-augmented teams. Roles, cadence, artifacts, and the economics, side by side.
Read the comparison →RACE Programming vs SAFe
SAFe scales coordination across many human teams; RACE Programming compresses the team so most of that coordination is no longer needed. Trains and Program Increments vs Stints.
Read the comparison →RACE Programming vs Kanban
Kanban manages the flow of whatever process you already run; RACE Programming prescribes the whole delivery model, and runs a kanban flow inside its own cycle.
Read the comparison →RACE Programming vs Extreme Programming
XP built engineering discipline around humans writing every line; RACE Programming keeps the discipline and moves the unit of work to specifying and validating AI.
Read the comparison →RACE Programming vs Shape Up
Shape Up fixes a six-week appetite for small human teams; RACE Programming shares the instincts but compresses the batch to a one-week Stint with an AI-augmented team.
Read the comparison →RACE Programming vs DevOps
DevOps optimizes the path from commit to production; RACE Programming assumes that path is automated as Everything as Code and moves the constraint upstream to specification.
Read the comparison →RACE Programming vs DORA
DORA and Accelerate measure delivery performance; RACE Programming is the operating model you adopt to move those numbers, and it changes which ones matter.
Read the comparison →RACE Programming vs Team Topologies
Team Topologies arranges many teams to manage cognitive load; RACE Programming shrinks the team so most of that coordination is no longer needed.
Read the comparison →